Skip Navigation

Journal of the London Mathematical Society 1998 57(2):351-362; doi:10.1112/S002461079800595X
© 1998 by London Mathematical Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wehrfritz, B. A. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The London Mathematical Society

Nilpotent-by-Finite Cofinitary Groups

B. A. F. Wehrfritz

School of Mathematical Sciences, Queen Mary & Westfield College Mile End Road, London E1 4NS

Received 28 November 1995.

Throughout this paper, D denotes a division ring (possibly commutative) and V a left vector space over D, usually, but not exclusively, infinite-dimensional. We consider irreducible subgroups G of GL(V) and are particularly interested in such G that contain an element g the fixed-point set CV(g) of which is non-zero but finite-dimensional (over D). We then use this to derive conclusions about cofinitary groups, an element g of GL(V) being cofinitary if dimDCV(g) is finite, and a subgroup of GL(V) being cofinitary if all its non-identity elements are cofinitary.

Suppose that G is a cofinitary subgroup of GL(V). There are two extreme cases. If dimDV is finite the cofinitary condition is vacuous. At the other extreme, if G acts fixed-point freely on V then the fixed-point sets CV(g) for gisinG\<1> are as small as possible, namely {0}. Work of Blichfeldt and his successors shows that certain irreducible linear groups G of dimension at least 2 over, for example, the complexes are always imprimitive. This is the case if G is nilpotent, or supersoluble, or metabelian. Apart from the two extreme cases, the same is frequently true for irreducible cofinitary subgroups G of GL(V). For example, this is the case if G is finitely generated nilpotent [9, 1.2] or more generally if G is supersoluble [10, 1.1], but not in general if G is metabelian [10, 7.1] or parasoluble (a group G is parasoluble if it has a normal series of finite length such that every subgroup of each of its factors is Abelian and normalised by G) (see [10, 7.2]). Further, it is also the case if G is Abelian-by-finite [10, 3.4], and every supersoluble group is finitely generated and nilpotent-by-finite. Collectively, these results suggest that one should consider nilpotent-by-finite groups.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.