Skip Navigation

Journal of the London Mathematical Society 1999 59(2):521-540; doi:10.1112/S0024610799007103
© 1999 by London Mathematical Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ojanguren, M.
Right arrow Articles by Suresh, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The London Mathematical Society

Witt Groups of the Punctured Spectrum of a 3-Dimensional Regular Local Ring and a Purity Theorem

M. Ojanguren, R. Parimala, R. Sridharan and V. Suresh

Université de Lausanne, Section de Mathématiques CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny, Switzerland
School of Mathematics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Homi Bhabha Road, Bombay 400 005, India

Received 15 August 1996.

Let A be a regular local ring with quotient field K. Assume that 2 is invertible in A. Let W(A)->W(K) be the homomorphism induced by the inclusion A{rightarrowhook}K, where W( ) denotes the Witt group of quadratic forms. If dim A≤4, it is known that this map is injective [6, 7]. A natural question is to characterize the image of W(A) in W(K). Let Spec1(A) be the set of prime ideals of A of height 1. For PisinSpec1(A), let {pi}P be a parameter of the discrete valuation ring AP and k(P) = AP/PAP. For this choice of a parameter {pi}P, one has the second residue homomorphism {partial}P:W(K)->W(k(P)) [9, p. 209]. Though the homomorphism {partial}P depends on the choice of the parameter {pi}P, its kernel and cokernel do not. We have a homomorphism


Formula

A part of the so-called Gersten conjecture is the following question on ‘purity’. Is the sequence


Formula

exact? This question has an affirmative answer for dim(A)≤2 [1; 3, p. 277]. There have been speculations by Pardon and Barge-Sansuc-Vogel on the question of purity. However, in the literature, there is no proof for purity even for dim(A) = 3. One of the consequences of the main result of this paper is an affirmative answer to the purity question for dim(A) = 3.

We briefly outline our main result.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.