Skip Navigation

Journal of the London Mathematical Society 1999 60(2):517-547; doi:10.1112/S0024610799007929
© 1999 by London Mathematical Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peixoto, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Da Silva, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The London Mathematical Society

Focal Decomposition and Some Results of S. Bernstein on the 2-Point Boundary Value Problem

M. M. Peixoto and A. R. Da Silva

Instituto de Matemática Pura e Aplicada 22460-320 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Peixoto{at}impa.br
Instituto de Matemática, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro 21945-970 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil beto{at}dmm.im.ufrj.br

Received 12 January 1995. Revision received 19 December 1997.

The subject is the 2-point boundary value problem for a second order ordinary differential equation


Formula
(1)

the simplest and oldest of all boundary value problems, which arose in Euler's work on calculus of variations in the eighteenth century. Accordingly, there is a vast literature, mostly in the context of applied mathematics, where one frequently uses the methods of functional analysis.

Here we adopt a different point of view: we look for the number of solutions of problem (1), if any, and how this number varies with the endpoints (t1, x1) and (t2, x2). The concept of focal decomposition, introduced in [15] and developed by Peixoto and Thom in [19], expresses precisely this point of view (see §2). It was further developed by Kupka and Peixoto in [10] in the context of geodesics. From there, one is led naturally to relationships with the arithmetic of positive definite quadratic forms, a line that is considered in [16]. In both [10] and [16] attention is drawn to the close formal relationship between focal decomposition and the Brillouin zones of solid state physics. In [17] this line is pursued further and it is pointed out that the focal decomposition associated to (1) appears naturally as a prerequisite for the semiclassical quantization of this equation via the Feynman path integral method.

The main goal of the present paper is to prove Theorem 2, stated at the end of §4. There we give a functional FormulaL(t, x, x) dt and consider its Euler equation. To this second order differential equation we associate the corresponding focal decomposition. Theorem 2 gives a criterion on the Lagrangian L from which we get a rough geometric description of this focal decomposition. It turns out to be somewhat similar to the one associated to the pendulum equation x+sin x = 0, worked out by Peixoto and Thom in [19, pp. 631, 197]. In the case L = (x2/2)–V(x) this type of focal decomposition is generic in some topological sense.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.