Skip Navigation

Journal of the London Mathematical Society 2001 63(2):268-274; doi:10.1017/S0024610700001721
© 2001 by London Mathematical Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knapp, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The London Mathematical Society

Artin's Conjecture for Forms of Degree 7 and 11

Michael P. Knapp

Department of Mathematics, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1109, USA

Received 23 October 1998. Revision received 1 May 2000.

A fundamental aspect of the study of Diophantine equations is that of determining when an equation has a local solution. Artin once conjectured (see the preface to [1]) that if k is a complete, discretely valued field with finite residue class field, then every homogeneous form of degree d in greater than d2 variables whose coefficients are integers of k has a nontrivial zero. In this paper, we consider the case of this conjecture in which k is a p-adic field. Although a counterexample due to Terjanian [16] proved Artin's conjecture false in this situation, Ax and Kochen [2] have shown when [k:Qp] = n is finite, that given d, there exists a number p(d, n) such that Artin's conjecture is true provided that p is larger than p(d, n). Unfortunately, the methods of Ax and Kochen do not lead to explicit estimates for p(d, n). Cohen [5] found a method which determines the possible cardinalities of the residue class fields of all p-adic fields for which Artin's conjecture is false, and Brown [3] has used this to bound p(d, 1), but this bound is so large that one feels that it must be possible to do better. Hence, it is still an interesting problem to obtain estimates on the size of p(d, n).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.