Skip Navigation

Journal of the London Mathematical Society 2005 72(1):73-90; doi:10.1112/S0024610705006459
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Tuyl, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The London Mathematical Society

The Defining Ideal of a Set of Points in Multi-Projective Space

Adam van Tuyl

Department of Mathematical Sciences, Lakehead University Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada avantuyl{at}sleet.lakeheadu.ca

Received 27 October 2003. Revision received 9 September 2004.

The defining ideal IX of a set of points X in Pn1 x ... x Pnk is investigated with a special emphasis on the case when X is in generic position, that is, X has the maximal Hilbert function. When X is in generic position, the degrees of the generators of the associated ideal IX are determined. {nu}(IX) denotes the minimal number of generators of IX, and this description of the degrees is used to construct a function {upsilon}(s; n1,...,nk) with the property that {nu}(IX)≥ {upsilon}(s; n1,..., nk) always holds for s points in generic position in Pn1 x ... x Pnk. When k = 1, {upsilon}(s;n1) equals the expected value for {nu}(IX) as predicted by the ideal generation conjecture. If k ≥ 2, it is shown that there are cases with {nu}(IX) > {upsilon}(s; n1, ..., nk). However, computational evidence suggests that in many cases {nu}(IX) = {upsilon}(s; n1, ..., nk).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.