Skip Navigation

Journal of the London Mathematical Society 2006 74(3):583-606; doi:10.1112/S0024610706023180
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Joyce, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The London Mathematical Society

Constructible Functions on Artin Stacks

Dominic Joyce

The Mathematical Institute 24–29 St. Giles', Oxford OX1 3LB, United Kingdom joyce{at}maths.ox.ac.uk

Received 13 April 2005. Revision received 10 January 2006.

Let K be an algebraically closed field, let X be a K-variety, and let X(K) be the set of closed points in X. A constructible set C in X(K) is a finite union of subsets Y(K) for subvarieties Y in X. A constructible function f : X(K) -> Q has f(X(K)) finite and f–1(c) constructible for all c != 0. Write CF(X) for the vector space of such f. Let {varphi} : X -> Y and {psi} : Y -> Z be morphisms of C-varieties. MacPherson defined a linear pushforward CF({varphi}) : CF(X) -> CF(Y) by ‘integration’ with respect to the topological Euler characteristic. It is functorial, that is, CF({psi} {circ} {varphi}) = CF({psi}) {circ} CF({varphi}). This was extended to K of characteristic zero by Kennedy.

This paper generalizes these results to K-schemes and Artin K-stacks with affine stabilizer groups. We define the notions of Euler characteristic for constructible sets in K-schemes and K-stacks, and pushforwards and pullbacks of constructible functions, with functorial behaviour. Pushforwards and pullbacks commute in Cartesian squares. We also define pseudomorphisms, a generalization of morphisms well suited to constructible functions problems.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.