Skip Navigation


Journal of the London Mathematical Society Advance Access originally published online on November 20, 2007
Journal of the London Mathematical Society 2007 76(3):739-756; doi:10.1112/jlms/jdm052
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
76/3/739    most recent
jdm052v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Choi, Y.-E.
Right arrow Articles by Rafi, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2007 London Mathematical Society

Comparison between Teichmüller and Lipschitz metrics

Young-Eun Choi

Penn State Altoona
3000 Ivyside Park
Altoona, PA 16601
USA
choiye{at}psu.edu

Kasra Rafi

Department of Mathematics
196 Auditorium Road, U-3009
University of Connecticut
Storrs, CT 06269-3009
USA

We study the Lipschitz metric on a Teichmüller space (defined by Thurston) and compare it with the Teichmüller metric. We show that in the thin part of the Teichmüller space the Lipschitz metric is approximated up to a bounded additive distortion by the sup-metric on a product of lower-dimensional spaces (similar to the Teichmüller metric as shown by Minsky). In the thick part, we show that the two metrics are equal up to a bounded additive error. However, these metrics are not comparable in general; we construct a sequence of pairs of points in the Teichmüller space, with distances that approach zero in the Lipschitz metric while they approach infinity in the Teichmüller metric.


www.math.uconn.edu/~rafi

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification 30F60 (primary), 32G15, 57M50 (secondary).

Received October 27, 2005; revised December 15, 2006; published online November 20, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.