Skip Navigation

Corrigendum for Folsom and Ono, J. London Math. Soc. 77 (2) 320-334.

Journal of the London Mathematical Society Advance Access originally published online on October 3, 2008
Journal of the London Mathematical Society 2009 79(2):544; doi:10.1112/jlms/jdn060
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
79/2/544    most recent
jdn060v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Folsom, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ono, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 London Mathematical Society

Duality involving the mock theta function f(q)

Amanda Folsom and Ken Ono

Department of Mathematics
University of Wisconsin
Madison
WI 53706
USA
folsom@math.wisc.edu

(J. London Math. Soc. (2) 77 (2008) 320–334)

Abstract

This corrigendum corrects Table (1.3) on p. 320. To our horror, in the preparation of the original manuscript we accidentally copied numerical estimates from the wrong computer program (implemented in MathematicaTM). We thank Sander Zwegers for bringing this to our attention. The corrected table, Table (1.3), appears below.


Formula

(1.3)

Footnotes

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification 11F37, 33D15.

Received June 24, 2008; published online October 3, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.